CarrierMark
FMCSA Compliance
CarrierMark Verified Scorecard
Cuevas Hauling LLC
USDOT 4455667 · MC-558310 · 9 units
As of Jul 14, 2026
Rule library v1.0 · eff. Jun 1, 2026
F
Grade
Compliance Status
0/100
Fail
Would this survive a DOT audit?
Would not survive a compliance review
The two grades move together here: compliance and defensibility tell a consistent story for this carrier.
F
Grade
Litigation Exposure
0/100
Severe
How badly does this play in litigation?
A plaintiff's lawyer's dream file

Built for underwriting. CSA scores tell you a carrier's roadside history. The Exposure grade tells you how a file plays after a crash: the litigation risk no other score prices.

Federal Safety Record (FMCSA)

Public USDOT data folded into the score, not an official safety rating

Official FMCSA Rating
Conditional
Rated Nov 20, 2025
Authority
Active
Contract
Insurance
On file
BIPD $750,000
Vehicle OOS
41.2%
Nat'l avg 21.3%
Driver OOS
14.0%
Nat'l avg 5.5%
Inspections
31
24-month roadside
Crashes
6
1 fatal · 2 injury
CarrierMark safety signal
CarrierMark's own read of the public measures
Severe
Source: public FMCSA SAFER / MCMIS data for USDOT 4455667, snapshot Jun 9, 2026. CSA BASIC percentiles are not shown (FAST Act §5223).

Broker Selection Risk

If you tender a load to this carrier: your negligent-selection exposure

SEVERE selection risk

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II (2026) let negligent-selection claims proceed against brokers. A broker or shipper that tendered a load to Cuevas could own that choice. These are the public red flags a reasonable vetting process would have surfaced first.

  • Conditional FMCSA safety rating
    A federal compliance review found this carrier's safety management deficient.
  • Vehicle out-of-service rate roughly double the national average
    41.2% vs 21.3% national.
  • Driver out-of-service rate roughly double the national average
    14% vs 5.5% national.
  • Fatal crash on the public record
    6 reported crashes including 1 fatal.
Scored only on public, pre-selection-knowable signals (Loyd v. Salazar: exposure turns on what was reasonably knowable, not hindsight). An informational risk read, not legal advice.

Why this grade

7 open findings · ranked by litigation exposure weight

1
Two active drivers are operating with expired medical examiner's certificates (lapsed 41 and 67 days).Part 391 · 49 CFR 391.432 drivers

Drivers who are not medically certified are, by regulation, not qualified to operate a CMV. Every mile after the lapse is a knowing dispatch of an unqualified driver: direct negligent-entrustment support and a punitive hook, multiplied across two drivers.

Exposure 5/5
2
No pre-employment controlled-substances test on file for three of the last four hires.Part 382 · 49 CFR 382.3013 hires

The pre-employment drug test is a federal precondition to safety-sensitive work. Its absence across most recent hires makes a negligent-hiring case nearly self-proving and reads as a carrier that doesn't run the program at all.

Exposure 5/5
3
Unit 7 returned to service after a roadside out-of-service order with no certified repair on file.Part 396 · 49 CFR 396.9Unit 7

An out-of-service vehicle back on the road without a certified repair is the cleanest unfit-equipment exhibit there is: the carrier put a truck the government pulled back into service without fixing it.

Exposure 5/5
4
FMCSA assigned a Conditional safety rating (rated Nov 2025): an agency finding that the carrier's safety management is deficient.Part 385 · 49 C.F.R. § 385.3

An official Conditional rating is the single strongest public data point a plaintiff has: a federal agency, after a compliance review, concluded this carrier's safety controls fall short. It anchors negligent hiring, retention, and entrustment, and a broker who tendered a load to a Conditional carrier post-Montgomery owns that choice.

Exposure 5/5
5
Driver qualification files are incomplete or missing for five of nine drivers.Part 391 · 49 CFR 391.515 drivers

Missing DQ files mean the carrier cannot show it verified its drivers were qualified before dispatch: a foundational failure that supports negligent hiring, entrustment, and supervision at once.

Exposure 5/5
6
Four power units are operating past their periodic annual inspection (lapsed 20–95 days).Part 396 · 49 CFR 396.174 units

Operating units past their required annual inspection is direct unfit-equipment evidence. Across four units it stops looking like an oversight and starts looking like a maintenance program that doesn't exist.

Exposure 4/5
7
Vehicle out-of-service rate (41.2%) is nearly double the national average (21.3%); driver OOS (14.0%) is more than double.Part 396 · 49 C.F.R. § 396.17Fleet-wide

Out-of-service rates this far above the norm are public, easily charted, and devastating in front of a jury: direct evidence of an unfit fleet operated by unfit drivers, mile after mile.

Exposure 4/5
Two independent scores, never collapsedScored against the CarrierMark rule library v1.0: CFR-cited rules across 49 C.F.R. Parts 391 / 382 / 396 / 395How this grade is calculated →

CarrierMark is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the FMCSA or U.S. DOT. The CarrierMark Score is an independent, informational assessment computed from public data and is not an official FMCSA safety rating or safety fitness determination.

Verified by CarrierMark as of Jul 14, 2026. This scorecard reflects the carrier's file at the time of generation.
Monitor this carrier with CarrierMark