CarrierMark
FMCSA Compliance
CarrierMark Verified Scorecard
Halverson Transport, Inc.
USDOT 3344556 · MC-602918 · 41 units
As of Jul 14, 2026
Rule library v1.0 · eff. Jun 1, 2026
B
Grade
Compliance Status
0/100
Pass
Would this survive a DOT audit?
Would survive a DOT audit
This file would mostly clear an audit but carries high litigation exposure. That gap is what a plaintiff's lawyer attacks.
F
Grade
Litigation Exposure
0/100
Severe
How badly does this play in litigation?
A plaintiff's lawyer's dream file

Built for underwriting. CSA scores tell you a carrier's roadside history. The Exposure grade tells you how a file plays after a crash: the litigation risk no other score prices.

Federal Safety Record (FMCSA)

Public USDOT data folded into the score, not an official safety rating

Official FMCSA Rating
Satisfactory
Rated Sep 1, 2022
Authority
Active
Common / Contract
Insurance
On file
BIPD $1,000,000
Vehicle OOS
24.0%
Nat'l avg 21.3%
Driver OOS
8.8%
Nat'l avg 5.5%
Inspections
64
24-month roadside
Crashes
5
0 fatal · 1 injury
CarrierMark safety signal
CarrierMark's own read of the public measures
High
FMCSA rates Halverson Satisfactory, but its inspection and crash record drives a high CarrierMark signal: the litigation risk the federal rating doesn't price.
Source: public FMCSA SAFER / MCMIS data for USDOT 3344556, snapshot Jun 11, 2026. CSA BASIC percentiles are not shown (FAST Act §5223).

Broker Selection Risk

If you tender a load to this carrier: your negligent-selection exposure

HIGH selection risk

Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II (2026) let negligent-selection claims proceed against brokers. A broker or shipper that tendered a load to Halverson could own that choice. These are the public red flags a reasonable vetting process would have surfaced first.

  • Vehicle out-of-service rate above the national average
    24% vs 21.3% national.
  • Driver out-of-service rate roughly double the national average
    8.8% vs 5.5% national.
  • Reported crashes on the public record
    5 reported crashes.
Scored only on public, pre-selection-knowable signals (Loyd v. Salazar: exposure turns on what was reasonably knowable, not hindsight). An informational risk read, not legal advice.

Why this grade

5 open findings · ranked by litigation exposure weight

1
Annual limited Clearinghouse query for D. Pruitt is 22 days overdue; the prior query returned a violation.Part 382 · 49 CFR 382.701(b)Dale Pruitt

An overdue annual query on a driver with a known prior drug/alcohol violation is the textbook negligent-retention exhibit: the carrier had actual notice and stopped monitoring. Plaintiff argues conscious indifference, a punitive-damages opening, even though the file otherwise looks clean.

Exposure 5/5
2
Annual MVR reviews are overdue for nine drivers (firm-wide, 19–140 days).Part 391 · 49 CFR 391.259 drivers

Each lapsed MVR review is a modest audit item, but the pattern is the story: a carrier that passes its paperwork audit yet stopped watching its drivers' records firm-wide. Plaintiff frames it as a system, not an oversight: the exact gap between a passing audit and real exposure.

Exposure 5/5
3
Unassigned driving time is accumulating across the fleet (6.4 hrs unreconciled this quarter).Part 395 · 49 CFR 395.8Fleet-wide

Unreconciled unassigned driving lets a plaintiff's expert argue the carrier cannot account for who was behind the wheel, and seeds a fatigue theory the moment a crash involves hours-of-service.

Exposure 4/5
4
Vehicle (24.0%) and driver (8.8%) out-of-service rates run above the national average despite a Satisfactory FMCSA rating.Part 396 · 49 C.F.R. § 396.17Fleet-wide

The federal letter rating is years old and says nothing about litigation risk. Above-average roadside out-of-service rates are exactly the public, jury-accessible data a plaintiff uses to argue the carrier knew its equipment and drivers were a problem: a negligent-retention narrative the Satisfactory rating papers over.

Exposure 4/5
5
Prior-employer safety investigations are incomplete for the four most recent hires.Part 391 · 49 CFR 391.23(a)(2)4 recent hires

Skipping the 3-year prior-employer safety investigation means the carrier never asked whether these drivers had a documented history elsewhere: the 'they should have known' inference that anchors negligent hiring.

Exposure 4/5
Two independent scores, never collapsedScored against the CarrierMark rule library v1.0: CFR-cited rules across 49 C.F.R. Parts 391 / 382 / 396 / 395How this grade is calculated →

CarrierMark is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the FMCSA or U.S. DOT. The CarrierMark Score is an independent, informational assessment computed from public data and is not an official FMCSA safety rating or safety fitness determination.

Verified by CarrierMark as of Jul 14, 2026. This scorecard reflects the carrier's file at the time of generation.
Monitor this carrier with CarrierMark